Close X
Get more out of WDDTY.com
by joining the site for free
Free 17-point plan to great health
Twice weekly e-news bulletins
Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
Sign up for free and claim your
17-point plan to great health
Free 17-point plan to great health

Twice weekly e-news bulletins

Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
OR

If you want to read our in-depth research articles or
have our amazing magazine delivered to your home
each month, then you have to pay.


Click here if you're interested
Helping you make better health choices

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

Subscribe!

Transfusion: 30% given wrong blood
About the author: 
WDDTY Team

About one-third of all people who had transfusions in Britain were given the wrong blood, an informal questionnaire has discovered

About one-third of all people who had transfusions in Britain were given the wrong blood, an informal questionnaire has discovered. Six people died from the error and a further 12 became ill. The rate is similar to that recorded in the US.

This is the first time that blood transfusions have ever been monitored in Britain, even though they have been practised for 50 years.

The findings were based on 245 blood transfusion laboratories who participated in the questionnaire. Of those, 20 laboratories volunteered the information of the 100 incidents in which the wrong blood was given, although the questionnaire did not enquire about errors.

The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, which carried out the informal study, is recommending the creation of a national system for reporting transfusion errors and fatalities. Such a system already exists in the US, set up by the FDA (BMJ, 7 May 1994).

The lack of scientific evidence for transfusions is also a matter of concern for another Edinburgh based association, the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

They heard at a recent meeting that medicine still cannot agree on how and when to transfuse red cells and how to assess the benefits.

And in those 50 years of use, transfusions have never been scrutinized by the "golden mean" of medicine, the randomized, double-blind study.

The Royal College has decided to begin remedying this situation by carrying out research into the benefits of red-cell transfusion. They will also encourage doctors to tell patients their reasons for giving a transfusion (The Lancet, 21 May 1994).

Doctors at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, England were able to save the life of a seriously injured man who had refused a transfusion. They used aggressive resuscitation and intensive care instead. However, a second man who also refused a transfusion died, and doctors believe his life could have been saved had he agreed to the procedure BMJ, 28 May 1994.


You may also be interested in...

Latest Tweet

About

Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, depression and many other chronic conditions.

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

Most Popular Health Website of the Year 2014

© 2010 - 2017 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved