Close X
Get more out of WDDTY.com
by joining the site for free
Free 17-point plan to great health
Twice weekly e-news bulletins
Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
Sign up for free and claim your
17-point plan to great health
Free 17-point plan to great health

Twice weekly e-news bulletins

Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
OR

If you want to read our in-depth research articles or
have our amazing magazine delivered to your home
each month, then you have to pay.


Click here if you're interested
Helping you make better health choices

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

Subscribe!

Patient power: ok, but just don't tell 'em
About the author: 
WDDTY Team

Phrases that include words such as 'tips' and 'icebergs' come to mind when the scale of adverse reactions to pharmaceutical drugs has tried to be established

Phrases that include words such as 'tips' and 'icebergs' come to mind when the scale of adverse reactions to pharmaceutical drugs has tried to be established.

One French study reckoned that just 1 in 20,000 reactions is ever reported, while the Yellow Card system in the UK has been a valiant failure. In virtually every reporting system, on both sides of the Atlantic, it's down to the doctor to do the paperwork. He either doesn't have the time, or he doesn't believe the drug has caused the effect, or perhaps he's being 'funded' by the pharmaceutical company to recruit unwitting patients in an invaluable 'trial' of the drug.

So the UK government came up with the astonishing idea that patients should be allowed to report their own reactions to a drug. They tested it over a 15-month period in one area of the UK to see if it is an idea worth introducing throughout the whole of the UK.

But in all that time just 39 reports of adverse reactions were received. So are drugs safer than we feared, or could it be that the public couldn't care less about better drug policing? Whatever the reason, it hardly seems worth the trouble and expense of democratizing medicine.

But hold! Could there be a third reason? Yes, of course, those who organized the trial forgot to tell anyone about it! Doctors in the area heard about it only for the first time last week when they read of its failure in the British Medical Journal. And a quick straw poll among pharmacists in the area found that they had never heard about it, probably because they don't read the journal.

This vexing dilemma has only one solution, health experts agree. The real problem is that patients in the trial area had to report reactions to NHS Direct, the 'public face' of the National Heath Service. Response would be far better if patients could report directly to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The agency in turn passes on its findings to the Committee on the Safety of Medicine, which has been criticized for being one of the most secretive groups in the UK, funded and run by the pharmaceutical industry.

That way we can get back to those tips and icebergs, and everyone can agree that at the very least they tried.

* To find out what's really going on in the world of pharmaceuticals, one book you really should read is Secrets of the Drugs Industry. To order your copy, click on this link: http://www.wddty.co.uk/shop/details.asp?product=341


You may also be interested in...

Latest Tweet

About

Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, depression and many other chronic conditions.

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

Most Popular Health Website of the Year 2014

© 2010 - 2017 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved