Close X
Get more out of
by joining the site for free
Free 17-point plan to great health
Twice weekly e-news bulletins
Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
Sign up for free and claim your
17-point plan to great health
Free 17-point plan to great health

Twice weekly e-news bulletins

Access to our News, Forums and Blogs

If you want to read our in-depth research articles or
have our amazing magazine delivered to your home
each month, then you have to pay.

Click here if you're interested
Helping you make better health choices

What Doctors Don't Tell You

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

February 2019 (Vol. 3 Issue 12)

The case against mass slaughter

About the author: 

The case against mass slaughter image

The Soil Association has recently come out against the government's policy on FMD

The Soil Association has recently come out against the government's policy on FMD. Here is the edited crux of the argument for an alternative put forward by Soil Association president Patrick Holford.

MAFF policy isn't workingThe number of cases continues to increase, and the disease is more virulent and has a shorter incubation period than was initially anticipated

Due to a lack of suitable manpower and resources, the time lag between detection, slaughter and incineration of carcasses is exacerbating disease spread

It is likely that airborne spread allows transfer of the disease to farms further afield than the current 'firebreak' distance of 3 km

The current policy is having a devastating effect on the rural economy and is particularly affecting tourism

There is growing opposition to the policy of slaughtering healthy animals both among the public and within the farming community, many of whom consider it morally unacceptable

Increased nationwide livestock movements since 1967, with longer distances travelled to abattoirs coupled with a globalised food industry (risk of contamination entering the country), has led

to the rapid transmission of disease throughout the UK.

Alternatives to mass slaughter

Slaughter only the livestock showing clinical symptoms of disease, or those with known direct or indirect contact with the infection

Use vaccination to 'damp down' the spread of disease in infected areas

Use vaccination instead of slaughter in 'firebreak' zones

Maintain current restrictions on livestock movement to prevent the infection of new regions until policy is working effectively; review how livestock movements are regulated in the future

Allow vaccinated animals to enter the UK food chain.

Strengths of the plan

Can be introduced immediately (there are 500,000 vaccine stocks, enough for one million sheep)

More likely to prove effective than the government's within a shorter timescale

Far less costly to implement (as most farmers are capable of administering inoculations)

'Firebreak' zones can be extended quickly and stock can be treated in situ

Confines need for slaughter to a much smaller number of animals, thus saving healthy animals on affected farms

Far more acceptable to public opinion and the farming community

Has proved effective in Albania and Macedonia in 1996 (eliminated disease in 12 and 3 weeks, respectively)

Current UK outbreak meets EU criteria for introduction of a vaccine control strategy.

A farmer's perspective image

A farmer's perspective

Latest Tweet


Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, depression and many other chronic conditions..

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

© 2010 - 2019 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved