Helping you make better health choices

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

Subscribe!

Weight gain and accumulated fluid

MagazineDecember 1995 (Vol. 6 Issue 9)Weight gain and accumulated fluid

I was rather disappointed in the article on slimming (vol 6 no 5) in your August 1995 edition

Dear WDDTY

I was rather disappointed in the article on slimming (vol 6 no 5) in your August 1995 edition. Your author seems to have fallen into the usual trap of assuming that weight is a balance between energy intake and energy expenditre. This totally flawed argument is one of the reasons why dieting is so unsuccessful by so many people.

Just because a person puts a certain amount of calories into their mouth, it does not mean to say that they absorb it. In addition, no studies have ever been done to determine whether diets have an increased or decreased fluid intake, whether they retain that fluid and whether they have larger or smaller faeces.

There was a very small note in the article's box discussing effective ways to diet, indicating that cutting out food allergies can help. Many members of the British Society for Allergy and Environmental Medicine and certainly the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have been aware for a long time that the ideal way of getting people's weight down is to cut out the foods to which they are reacting, whether it is intolerance or food allergy. Many practitioners including myself believe that many people who are overweight are simply waterlogged, since allergic reactions cause them to accumulate fluid.

Indeed, the NuTron test, a blood test which identifies food intolerance, as well as several others which work similarly, such as the ALCAT tests, have all shown how effectively a person can lose weight without necessarily reducing their carbohydrate intake. Once the food intolerances are identified and removed from the diet, in most (although not all cases), the person loses weight.

Indeed, I know of a person who started off at 25 1/2 stone and lost seven stone in seven months on a diet which consisted of between 4,000 and 6,000 calories a day by simply eliminating those foods identified by the NuTron test.

On the NuTron diet, there is no restriction in quantity of "safe" other foods. By not reducing calories unreasonably low, the person does not lose energy, which seems to be the problem that happens to most people on a calorie restricted diet.

Once the weight has been effectively lost, patients can then occasionally eat the foods which were previously banned. This approach is not nearly well enough understood, and I have little doubt that in due course it will become far more acceptable. Dr Patrick Kingsley, Osgathorpe......


The link with diet and vaccines

The link between vaccinations and seizures

You may also be interested in...

Sign up for free today

Sign up now to get your FREE 17-point Plan to Great Health

Free membership gives you access to our latest news reports, use of our community area, forums, blogs, readers' health tips and our twice-weekly
e-news letter.

WDDTY Recommends

Latest Tweet

About

Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, cancer, depression and many other chronic conditions.

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

Most Popular Health Website of the Year 2014

© 2010 - 2016 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved