Close X
Get more out of WDDTY.com
by joining the site for free
Free 17-point plan to great health
Twice weekly e-news bulletins
Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
Sign up for free and claim your
17-point plan to great health
Free 17-point plan to great health

Twice weekly e-news bulletins

Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
OR

If you want to read our in-depth research articles or
have our amazing magazine delivered to your home
each month, then you have to pay.


Click here if you're interested
Helping you make better health choices

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

Subscribe!

Eu directive:

About the author: 

Despite what you may have read in your newspaper, it wasn't all doom and gloom this week about the EU's Food Supplements Directive

Despite what you may have read in your newspaper, it wasn't all doom and gloom this week about the EU's Food Supplements Directive. Yes, the European Court of Justice took the very unusual step of disregarding the Advocate General's recommendation to scupper the directive. Yes, that means the restrictions on vitamins and supplements come into force throughout all EU nations in two weeks' time, on August 1.
But, no, you probably won't notice any difference. In this case it's the angel that's in the detail, and it's all to do with the Positive List. In its original form, the Directive would allow onto the list - and so, suitable for sale - only those natural ingredients that a manufacturer could prove were safe. This would cost the manufacturer around lb250,000 per ingredient, so a multi-vitamin might cost about lb750,000 to get onto the list.
Campaigners such as the Alliance for Natural Health argued that it was absurd to have to prove as 'safe' nutrients that are in our food, and which have been taken in some form or another for many hundreds of years.
The European Court of Justice agrees, and in allowing the Directive has also added more than a fair share of common sense to the regulations. For a start, the justices have decided that any nutrient that's already consumed as part of our regular diets doesn't have to be included on the Positive List. They have also decided that the burden of proof should fall on the regulator, who would have to prove that a nutrient wasn't safe. It's enough for a manufacturer to submit an ingredient to the Positive List, and then it's down to the regulator to disallow it, and give a full explanation of its decision.
As a result, the UK's Food Standards Agency said that it doesn't know of one supplement that would be banned under the revised directive.
The next hurdle is determining what is a 'safe upper limit' for vitamins and supplements. The danger is that the EU may, by default, adopt the Codex guidelines, which are being shaped by German and French delegates (see Enews no. 170). If they succeed, we will see levels drop dramatically in liberal countries such as Britain and Holland.
All of this means that the tremendous work of the Alliance goes on, and they still need your support and any contributions you can make. Donations can be made on their website http://www.alliance-natural-health.org


Blood tests

Osteoporosis

Latest Tweet

About

Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, depression and many other chronic conditions.

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

Most Popular Health Website of the Year 2014

© 2010 - 2017 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved