Close X
Get more out of WDDTY.com
by joining the site for free
Free 17-point plan to great health
Twice weekly e-news bulletins
Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
Sign up for free and claim your
17-point plan to great health
Free 17-point plan to great health

Twice weekly e-news bulletins

Access to our News, Forums and Blogs
OR

If you want to read our in-depth research articles or
have our amazing magazine delivered to your home
each month, then you have to pay.


Click here if you're interested
Helping you make better health choices

What Doctors Don't Tell You

In shops now or delivered to your home from only £3.50 an issue!

Subscribe!
April 2018 (Vol. 3 Issue 2)

Calories aren't all created equal

Search

About

Bryan Hubbard is Publisher and co-editor of WDDTY. He is a former Financial Times journalist. He is a Philosophy graduate of London University. Bryan is also the author of several books, including The Untrue Story of You and Secrets of the Drugs Industry.

Archive

2018

2017

2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

Calories aren't all created equal

March 27th 2018, 11:59
394 views      

You wouldn't ask your doctor about nutrition any more than you'd interrogate a nomadic tribesman of the Sahara about the intricacies of snow. The typical doctor's dietary knowledge is primitive, but then, he's only been taught about it in medical school for an average of 10 or so hours over his five years of training.

Most doctors cling to the extraordinary idea, first proposed in 1878 by the German nutritionist Max Rubner, that 'a calorie is a calorie.' Interestingly, it was resurrected in the 1950s by the sugar industry when their products came under public scrutiny for a brief while (before it was successfully deflected to saturated fats in animal products, which became the artery-clogging bad guy until, well, pretty much today).

The 'calorie is a calorie' camp believes it's all to do with quantity, and not quality: all calories are equal. Follow that path to its logical conclusion, and you'll pass through a black hole in deepest space and out into a strange parallel universe where Wonderland suddenly makes sense. In this distorted world, there's no direct-line correlation between what we eat and our overall health—just as long as we're eating enough of anything. Someone who eats 500 calories of Cocoa Krispies every day, for instance, will be as healthy as someone else who munches through a similar quantity of broccoli.

While the 'calorie is a calorie' mantra is the dominant idea in medicine, nations will continue to throw enormous sums at treating the sick (at the most recent count, that's over $3 trillion in the US every year). According to the prevailing wisdom, the sums keep rising every year primarily because people are living longer. But that's simplistic: the real problem is that people are living badly.

That's borne out by a recent survey of grocery shopping habits in 19 European nations. Researchers at the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil estimated how much the average household in each country spent on 'ultra-processed' foods—industrially made products like salty snacks, sugary cereals, instant meals and soda. They found that for every four percent increase in the availability of ultra-processed food, there was a one percent increase in the prevalence of obesity.1

Britain's shopping cart was the least healthy, with ultra-processed foods making up over 50 percent of daily grocery purchases; Germany had the dubious distinction of coming in second, at 46 percent, while these foods made up the smallest part of the diet in Portugal (10 percent) and Italy (13 percent).

Unlike doctors, researcher Carlos Monteiro said he had "deep concerns" about the impact that processed food has on our health and obesity. "Take breakfast cereals like Froot Loops. They are 50 percent sugar, but there is no fruit. Ultra-processed foods are essentially new creations of the food industry with very low-cost ingredients in a very attractive product," he said. Not only are they attractively presented, they are also highly addictive, of course.

The quality-not-quantity school of thought (and one that is diametrically opposed to the 'a calorie-is-a-calorie' theory) has been explored by Valter Longo, a professor at the University of Southern California. He believes we can live to 110 years old, and that's something that is within our grasp today—if we eat healthily. Not only is the quality of the food we eat vital, we should be eating less, and go on a day-long fast at least four times a year when we consume fewer than 800 calories (that's one in the eye for the calorie-is-a-calorie camp).

Eating well (and less) can also reverse a range of chronic conditions, says Longo, including multiple sclerosis and even some cancers—and he's carried out 15 clinical trials to prove it.

And he practices what he preaches, by restricting his sugar intake, eating low to moderate amounts of starches from pasta, bread and rice, and plenty of carbohydrates from legumes and vegetables; protein comes from nuts and salmon rather than from other animal fats.

It's not difficult to follow. "I love food. I'm never hungry, my friends can't believe how much I eat—but people don't understand food. I eat much more food than others, but much less calories," he told The Times.2

But then, he knows that it's about quality, not quantity.

References

1

Public Health Nutr, 2018; 21: 18-26

2

The Times, January 27, 2018

Latest Tweet

About

Since 1989, WDDTY has provided thousands of resources on how to beat asthma, arthritis, depression and many other chronic conditions.

Start by looking in our fully searchable database, active and friendly community forums and the latest health news.

Positive SSL Wildcard

Facebook Twitter

Most Popular Health Website of the Year 2014

© 2010 - 2017 WDDTY Publishing Ltd.
All Rights Reserved