Hernia: Keyhole surgery is no better than a standard op

Laparoscopic – or keyhole - surgery is the new, less invasive method that allows the patient to leave the hospital after just a few days.

But is it actually better for the patient in the long run? 

A new study of 233 hernia patients, who had either the standard ‘open’ surgery or laparoscopy, discovered virtually no difference between the two approaches.

Recurrence rates were similar in the two groups, the study found.  The one advantage was that laparoscopic surgery was far less dangerous for the patient, who was also able to leave hospital sooner.

(Source: Archives of Surgery, 2007; 142: 562-7).

Click here to receive health news by email.

Related WDDTY Content

Keyhole surgery

Recently, minimally invasive, or keyhole, surgery (laparoscopy see ... ...

Keyhole surgery - The doctor as video games player

Surgeons are rushing in to try their hand at minimally invasive operations without proper training or understanding of when they are appropriate. ...

Keyhole hernia op: more complications than open surgery

New research from the UK has prompted calls for a curtailment of laparoscopic hernia repairs, in favour of general surgery. ...

Gallbladder cancer linked to keyhole surgery

Keyhole surgery can trigger gallbladder cancer or cause it to recur, researchers have found. The procedure, known as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whi...

Case study: Risks of Keyhole surgery

In August 1991 I underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (removal of the gall bladder via keyhole surgery) and shortly afterward experienced pain on...

Organ injury during laparoscopy affects quality of life

Even if the repair operation is a technical ‘success’, bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal by ‘keyhole’ su...