Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Smear tests: new guidelines

Women whose cervical smears turn up mild abnormalities should not have invasive investigations, according to guidelines recently drawn up by a workshop in Oxford.

In its recommendations, called the NHS Cervical Screening Programme, the National Co-ordinating Network concluded that women with minor cell abnormalities, such as "borderline or mildly dyskarotic smears", should follow a path of "surveillence". This entails having a repeat smear six months later, only followed by a colposcopy (a visual examination of the cervix through a special instrument) if the smear continues to show abnormality.

It is recommended that women with moderate or severe abnormality be given immediate colposcopy.

These guidelines represent a complete reversal of those of 1987, which recommended that all women with abnormalities of any type be immediately given colposcopy.

The decision is based in part on two admissions, according to Joseph Jordan, a consultant at the Department of Gynaecology, Birminham and Midland Hospital for Women.

The first is that medicine doesn't understand whether "women with mild cytological abnormalities develop invasive cancer without progressing through more severe degrees of . . .abnormality."

The second, according to a BMJ study in 1988 (297:18-21), is that "nearly half of all smears with mild abnormalities revert to normal within two years, with no patient developing invasive cancer on longer term follow up."



WDDTY Blog Speak

Smear tests: expensive errors - Women have had another salutary reminder that, despite what doctors and the government like to pretend, the cervical smear test is a far from foolproo...

Smear tests not saving lives - Although women are pressurized to have a cervical smear test, a major new official study shows it is ineffective. ...

Smear tests: innocent changes - Inflammation of the cervix should not be taken as indicative of any disease, according to Canadian research. ...

What doctors read - The National Cervical Screening programme, the programme that was going to reduce the number of women dying from cervical cancer, is still not really...

Screening: false alarms - A decided lack of standards in the cervical cancer screening programme is responsible for many false diagnoses of cancer, announced the National Audit...

Case study: Cervical abnormalities - I read with interest your articles about cervical cancer in young women. My 18 year old daughter, after months of pains in her abdomen, went to a spe...

Cervical smears - Double-check this inaccurate test - If you’re a woman, your GP or gynaecologist undoubtedly press-gangs you into having a Pap smear test periodically to screen against cervical cancer....

I found a non-invasive cure for my cancer - It is difficult to believe that I was diagnosed with advanced invasive breast cancer - and given a poor prognosis - back in April 2000. Eight months l...