Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Smear tests not saving lives

Although women are pressurized to have a cervical smear test, a major new official study shows it is ineffective.

Death rates from cervical cancer have not varied in 20 years, despite the increased use of the tests.

These findings are based on monitoring nearly 250,000 women in Bristol, England over 20 years. In 1992, the death rate was similar to that in 1975-79, when continuous screening was introduced.

Equally worrying is the unnecessary intervention that screening can spark. During every screening, around 15,000 women were told they were at risk, more than 5,500 of them were investigated and many were treated "for a disease that would never have troubled them," said researchers.

Apart from the distress and worry, wrong diagnosis also affected the women's chances of getting life insurance, and raised fears that the treatment could ruin their chances of conceiving.

Needless to say, the medical establishment was quick to try and offset any alarms the study might have started. Some wondered if the study was too small to be considered representative, while the government's Cervical Screening Programme said that the risk factors such as smoking, multiple partners and sex at an early age had increased since the 1960s, but the death rate from cervical cancer had fallen-albeit, by only several hundred (Monitor Weekly, June 14, 1995).



WDDTY Blog Speak

Smear tests: expensive errors - Women have had another salutary reminder that, despite what doctors and the government like to pretend, the cervical smear test is a far from foolproo...

Death rate plunge: not from screening - Health officials who have been congratulating their extensive mammogram screening programmes as the reason for the sudden drop in breast cancer deaths...

Smear tests: new guidelines - Women whose cervical smears turn up mild abnormalities should not have invasive investigations, according to guidelines recently drawn up by a worksho...

Air pollution control reduces death rate - Irish researchers have found that measures to control air pollution have dramatically reduced the death rate from respiratory and cardiovascular disea...

Cervical cancer: - A vaccine that glaxo thinks is great - Cervical cancer is invariably caused by the HPV (human papillomavirus) infection. Globally around 470,000 new cases are reported every year, and the...

Low bone density or other risk factors? - It is generally assumed that low bone density indicates fracture risk. However, dense bones may not necessarily be sufficient to prevent hip fracture...

Smear tests: innocent changes - Inflammation of the cervix should not be taken as indicative of any disease, according to Canadian research. ...

Caesarean: It triples the death rate in newborns - Babies born by Caesarean section are three times more likely to die soon afterwards than those born naturally, a new study has discovered.