Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Drugs and Side Effects

Serevent

The story so far: Serevent (salmeterol xinafoate) is a beta-agonist inhaler for asthmatics. Deaths were so quickly associated with the drug following its approval that the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), launched a special trial, testing the drug against a placebo.

The Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial (SMART) ended in December 1996. It compared 42 mcg of Serevent given twice a day to 13,174 asthmatics with 13,179 patients given a placebo.

Yet, the trial results were not published until the end of 2002 - six years later. They confirmed that the drug was fatal among some users, especially African Americans.

So, for how long did the manufacturer know the trial results before announcing them? And how many people died unnecessarily from the drug because they were unaware of its possible fatal effects?

The US drugs regulator, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), was clearly concerned by the findings, and decided to have ‘discussions’ with the manufacturer. Was the drug about to be banned? A hushed nation awaited the decision . . .

Now read on: The discussions had continued for seven months before the FDA decided to - change the wording on the label. This draconian measure has no doubt sent a shock wave through the pharmaceutical industry, leaving it with no doubt whatsoever that its drugs must not kill the patient and, if they do, the manufacturer may have to say so on the label.

Of course, the FDA continued, this does not mean that people should stop taking the drug. A GSK spokeswoman said: 'Abruptly stopping medications may result in acutely deteriorating asthma control, which may be life-threatening'.

This is opposed to continuing drug therapy, which can be, er, life-threatening.

Patients with worsening or acute asthma shouldn’t be prescribed the drug in the first place. That really would be tempting fate.



WDDTY Blog Speak

Serevent - The wheels of power in medicine lurch slowly, and there are occasions when it’s as well to be considered and reflective. These virtues become vices, h...

Drugs drug alerts - Asthma drugs: they are safe, really, aren’t they? - When it comes to drug safety, how safe is safe? Take, for instance, three beta-agonist bronchodilators that have been used by asthma sufferers. One, S...

Misclassification of deaths skews cancer trial results - Analysis of cancer-screening trials has found major inconsistencies in determining deaths due to all causes and deaths due to specific cancers, thereb...

Drug Secrecy: GSK threatened career of whistle-blower - GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the drug company, threatened to either sue or ruin the career of a medical researcher who spoke out against its diabetes drug A...

Serevent - "I sleep well" is the headline used to market Allen & Hanburys' anti-asthma inhaler Serevent. Such a statement may be just a dream for many users; tes...

Asthma drugs: - Bronchodilators double death risk in first 12 months - Asthma drugs have had a chequered past, going back to the early 1960s when the non-selective beta-agonist isoprenaline was withdrawn. Since then worr...

Diuretics given unnecessarily - Many elderly patients are being unnecessarily treated with diuretic drugs, according to research from the Netherlands. ...

Drugs shock: - So it's not just vioxx that may be a problem - Things are seriously unravelling for big pharma at the moment. Within days of Merck withdrawing its painkiller Vioxx, a leading Food and Drug Adminis...