Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Cell communication: the usual suspects

One of the greatest mysteries of biology is how we and every other living thing take geometric shape. Modern scientists mostly understand how we have blue eyes or grow to six-foot-one, and even how cells divide. Far more elusive is how these cells know exactly where to place themselves at each stage of the building process so that an arm becomes an arm rather than a leg, and the mechanism which gets these cells to organise and assemble themselves together into what will ultimately be a three-dimensional human form.

The usual scientific explanation has to do with the chemical interactions between molecules and with DNA, the coiled double helix of genetic coding that holds the blueprint of the body’s proteins and amino acids. Each DNA helix, or chromosome - and identical 26 pairs are found in each of the thousand million million cells in your body - contains a chain of nucleotides, or bases, of four different components (shortened to A, T, C and G), arranged in a unique order in every living thing.

The most favoured idea is that there is a genetic ‘programme’ of genes operating collectively to determine shape or, in the view of neo-Darwinists such as Richard Dawkins, that ruthless genes, like Chicago thugs, have the power to create form and that we are ‘survival machines’ - robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes.

This theory promotes DNA as the Renaissance man of the human body - architect, master builder and central engine room - whose tool for all this amazing activity is a handful of chemicals that make proteins.

Undoubtedly, proteins play a major role in body function. Where the Darwinists fall short is in explaining exactly how DNA knows when to orchestrate this and also how these chemicals, all blindly bumping into each other, can operate more or less simultaneously. Each cell undergoes, on average, some 100,000 chemical reactions per second - a process that repeats itself simultaneously across every cell in the body.

And if all these processes are due to simple chemical collision between molecules, how does it work anywhere near rapidly enough to account for the coherent behaviours that living beings exhibit every minute of their lives?

When a fertilised egg starts to multiply and produce daughter cells, each begins by adopting a structure and function according to its eventual role in the body. Although every daughter cell contains the same chromosomes with the same genetic information, certain types of cells immediately ‘know’ to use different genetic information to behave differently from others. So certain genes must ‘know’ that it is their turn to be played, rather than the rest of the pack. This requires nothing less than an ingenious method of communication between cells at a very early stage of the embryo’s development, and the same sophistication every moment of our lives.

Geneticists appreciate that cell differentiation depends on cells knowing how to differentiate early on, and then somehow remembering that they are different and passing on this vital piece of information to subsequent generations of cells. At the moment, scientists shrug their shoulders as to how this might all be accomplished, particularly at such a rapid pace.

In other words, like policemen desperate to close a case, scientists have arrested the most likely suspect without bothering with the painstaking process of gathering proof. The details of this absolute certainty - of how proteins might accomplish this task all on their own - are left decidedly imprecise.



WDDTY Blog Speak

Human energy fields: Fritz-Albert Popp - Frontier scientists around the globe have discovered evidence of the existence of a quantum energy field. The field may not only explain homoeopathy,...

Volume 12 / Issue 7 - Oct 2001 - Human Energy Fields - Beings of light -

. . .or maybe not so miraculous - I found ‘Human energy fields’ (WDDTY, vol 12 no 7) very interesting, but nowhere near as miraculous as you did.

Shedding light on biophotons - Your article on human energy fields (WDDTY, vol 12 no 7) has shed light (if I can put it like that) on a number of things.

Bad genes - One of the looniest medical solutions I've come across recently has to do with some experimental work being done with the herpes virus for people with...

Soil quality worsens as chemicals increase - Disastrous mismanagement of our soil and intensive farming methods have created such poor food quality that high-dose supplements are not a luxury, bu...

Breast Cancer Survival: It may have nothing to do with your genes - Breast cancer survival may not have as much to do with your genes as scientists like to tell us. Women with mutations in genes known as BRCA 1 and 2...

Diabetes: more on cow's milk - The theory that diabetes is caused by a too early exposure to cow's milk usually as a substitute for breast milk has been supported with a scientific...