Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports by joining our e-news community.

Four FREE health reports for you

Register now for our vital and insightful health updates, and get four free health reports to help you live more healthily.

First Name:Email:


Osteoporosis: a load of old bones - How accurate is bone testing?

Currently, most screening systems measure bone mineral density (BMD). Susan Ott, associate professor at the University of Washington in Seattle, has warned of high levels of imprecision in screening systems and multiple measurement techniques, which is particularly worrying when women are using the results to decide whether or not to take HRT. In addition, Ott argues that since bone density and bone strength aren't necessarily related, there may be no point in measuring BMD (BMJ, April 9, 1994).

However, even if BMD were an indicator of bone strength, changes are not usually reversible, and very low density might be detected too late for most effective interventions (BMJ, Jul 22 1995).

An earlier study concluded that BMD measurements are a poor screening test for future hip fracture. It found that among all women screened, thr group at highest risk had less than half the fractures over a nine-year peril (Ann Intern Med, 1986; 104:817-23).

A large review of published work on BMD screening has concluded that BMD screening has never been shown to be effective in preventing osteoporotic fracture. Measurements vary at different times and with different equipment, and BMD varies very little between the groups who will and won't go on to suffer fracture (Bristol: Health Care Evaluation Unit, University of Bristol, 1992.)

The majority opinion from North America and the UK is against random screening. Nevertheless, measuring bone mass may be an important tool in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in high-risk groups and for monitoring some patients (BMJ, June 10, 199S). If you get a low reading, it might be a good idea to get a second opinion and also to check the age of the equipment and the experience of the operator.

Safety-wise, DEXA, the most widely used system, uses lower doses of radiation than single-photon absorptiometry (SPA), dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The average skin exposure for DEXA is I to 3 mrad per scan (compared to 8-10 mrads for chest x-rays, for example). QCT uses the highest radiation dose.



WDDTY Blog Speak

Fluoride: hip fracture risk - Fluoride in the water supply actually increases the risk of hip fracture among the elderly, a seven year study among the over 65s of Utah has discover...

Bone mass points to breast cancer risk - Bone mass levels may be another indicator to determine a woman's risk of developing breast cancer, researchers have discovered. ...

Screening fails to show fracture risk - A screening programme to identify menopausal women who may go on to suffer fractures by measuring their bone mineral density has been dismissed by a S...

Inhaled steroids lower bone mass in female asthmatics - The use of inhaled steroids for long-term treatment of asthma may lead to reduced bone density in premenopausal women.

Hormones for prostate cancer cause osteoporosis - Prostate cancer patients treated with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) have significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) at almost...

Bone density level not a key factor in fractures - The decrease in bone density that accompanies aging is only a small factor in the greatly increased risk of hip fracture in older life, researchers ha...

Low bone risk fractured - The widely held view that women suffering from low bone density are more likely to suffer a fracture doesn't stack up. New research shows that only ha...

Alternative treatment for . . . osteoporosis - These days, the first line of pharmaceutical defence against osteoporosis is a class of drugs called ‘bisphosphonates’, including risedronate and alen...