Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Doctors training notes

Treatment notes no. 4586

A new, breakthrough study has discovered that doctors are human. As a result, they naturally view most of their patients as 'foolish, uncomprehending, hysterical or malingering'. This is certainly the case when the patient presents with a health problem that has a mysterious cause.

Unfortunately, the report continues, most illnesses have a mysterious cause, so it follows that most patients must be viewed by their doctor as perhaps foolish, uncomprehending, hysterical or malingering - or all of the above.

However, the doctor must overcome these natural, and human, feelings and should instead endeavour to communicate with the patient (even if he probably is hysterical or a malingerer).

Now, most patients can hold only seven thoughts in their head at one time, so we can safely add 'stupid' to that foregoing list. Professionals (i.e. non-patients) also use vague quantifiers such as ‘rarely’ and ‘unlikely’, which are instantly understood by a fellow professional. This confuses the patient, however, because he is also innumerate.

Worse, patients look for clear answers - for example, they like to label a disease and ask questions such as 'What’s wrong with me, doctor?' - but yielding to that pressure is a trap that the professional must avoid at all costs.

Finally, don’t use long words. When you have nothing to say to a patient who you doubt has anything wrong with him, use simple, monosyllabic terms - which, unfortunately, rules out such useful terms as ‘moron’ or, indeed, any of the foregoing terms that describe patients. However, words such as ‘not’ and ‘ill’ would work, as would ‘don’t’ and ‘know’ (BMJ, 2003; 326: 595-7).



WDDTY Blog Speak

One freedom at a time - A few months ago, I got a letter from Imogen, my local health visitor. She invited me to take in my 18 month old daughter and discuss in case she ha...

How to treat the patient: study notes for your doctor - The following is based on study notes published in an academic journal to help doctors improve their inter personal skills with the patient There...

Prenatal scans inaccurate one third of time - The prenatal miracle of ultrasound has taken another knock in one of the largest studies to be conducted on its efficacy. ...

Confused reading of the data - Your reporter Pat Thomas confuses two studies which we shall refer to as the Health Food Shoppers study (HFS) and the Oxford Vegetarian study (OV). Mo...

Gallstones: when in doubt . . . - We know where they come from, we have a good idea what to do about many of them, yet gallstones are one of medicine's great travesties. Nearly one in...

Google: It’s the way doctors find out about your condition, just like you - What do you do when you want to find out more about a health problem? Right. You go on Google, or a similar search engine, and look through the resu...

Dealing with hysterical women - We all know that women are fluffy, silly things and that it’s no good trying to communicate rationally to them. Talk science to them and they’ll proba...

Aids defining illnesses - AIDS is usually characterized by a number of "opportunistic" diseases, which can become active in a body whose immune system has been severely comprom...