Click here to read about some of the people we've helped.  We're here to help you, too. Get four essential health reports when you join our e-news community.

FREE REPORT. Your key pointers to a life-transforming diet

Find out the best diet for you in one of four free reports we'll give you when you join the WDDTY community. We'll also send you up-to-the-moment health news and advice twice a week, packed full of insights that may well transform your own health.

First Name:Email:


Family matters

Fibrocystic breasts

A 50-year-old woman has had fibrocystic breasts for many years. After a mammogram eight years ago, she developed an enlarged cyst. She has now started to feel different sensations in her breasts and wants some reassurance. Her medical advisors recommend a mammogram; however, she is reluctant as her breast tissue is so dense because of her condition. She feels that the weight of the machine on her last time caused damage to the cells and tissues in her breasts. Any suggestions? In the late 1970s Dr Sitruk-Ware discovered that women with fibrocystic breasts were oestrogen dominant. He treated these women with transdermal natural progesterone (not the same as synthetic progestins) and the results showed that the majority of his patients' breasts returned to normal within 3 to 4 months. (Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979). Dr John Lee's experiences also confirm these findings and he recommends adding vitamin E (600 IU), magnesium (300 mg) and vitamin B6 (50 g) every day. He cautions that abstinence from coffee/tea/colas/chocolate may have little or no result. Mammograms are especially painful to any woman with this condition. Try using a natural progesterone cream such as Serenity Cream from Wellsprings Trading Ltd. One reader says that since she started using it regularly during her menstrual cycle, her breasts have ceased to be lumpy and she doesn’t feel the discomfort and burning sensations she previously did.



WDDTY Blog Speak

Fibrocystic breasts - A 50-year-old woman has had fibrocystic breasts for many years. After a mammogram eight years ago, she developed an enlarged cyst. She has now started...

Vitamin e: - For 'dangerous', read the small print - 'People still take dangerous vitamin E', said a headline in a recent medical journal. Dangerous? Of course, they're referring to the recent major st...

Vitamin e - Yes, but. . . - The world's press has gleefully jumped on the study that suggests high doses of vitamin E could increase the risk of heart attack and stroke. The ris...

Vitamin e: heart protection - Large doses of vitamin E can protect men and women against heart disease, according to two major American studies. ...

Vitamin b6 debate continues - I was very interested to read the two "opposing" letters on treatment with vitamin B6, in last month's issue. However, surely that does not make two o...

Vitamin b6 made me ill - You claim to inform people of health risks and yet deny the one from vitamin B6. I am horrified to read that you are supporting those misguided indiv...

Vitamin b6 made me better - I was very pleased that the government's decision to limit vitamin B6 supplements was mentioned in WDDTY. I am very concerned about whether B6 is bei...

Vitamin E supplements: They’re good—but they could be even better - Vitamin E has had a slippery ride since its discovery in 1922, when it was hailed as a virtual cure-all. Our bodies can’t make vitamin E; we have to o...